Murray v. Janssen

November 2015

Result: Jury Award of $1.75 million

The jury found that Johnson & Johnson did “negligently fail to adequately warn physicians/health care providers of the extent of the risk of Gynecomastia stemming from the use of Risperdal.” The jury also decided that Johnson & Johnson’s negligence was “a substantial factor in bringing about” the plaintiff’s gynecomastia, and they awarded $1.75 million. Because Murray was from Maryland, judge Victor J. DiNubile, Jr. applied a Maryland law that places a cap on “noneconomic damages” available to a plaintiff in a personal injury case, and he entered a reduced judgement of $680,000. The 18 page opinion, however, reinforced many of the plaintiff’s arguments relating to defendants’ negligence and plaintiff’s claim of causation. The Plaintiffs have appealed the application of the damage cap reduction.

Public Records:







Press Reports:

First Two Risperdal Cases Set for Trial on Punitive Damages | Law.com | September 18, 2018

Pa. Appeals Court Sends Back Risperdal Case for Look at Punitive Damages | Law.com | February 21, 2018

J&J Hit With $1.75M Verdict In 4th Philly Risperdal Case | Law360.com | November 9, 2015